Tax On Selling A Used Boat Ontario Would You Support The Fair Tax?
Would you support the Fair Tax? - tax on selling a used boat ontario
Although the 15th April. has passed, and we are 9 months of this year due to acid and fear, I think most people would agree that our tax legislation, a complete disaster. I've seen estimates that it costs about 50 cents to collect a dollar - not very efficient.
The Fair Tax would be the repeal of the 16th. The amendment to tax and renewal of the retail tax at the national level (NRST). No longer withhold his salary. But if you buy a pair of jeans or a new car or a bike or something that you NRST by 15% to 20% have to pay. Food, drugs and the purchase of principal residence are exempt.
Systems are living for a family of four necessary conditions for life on or below the poverty line would increase by the NRSTper month and this amount to all families regardless of income Prebate. The Prebate is revenue neutral for the lowest income.
Tax Fairness on the black economy "cash" as a tax on their purchases. It is also a good way to reward savings and investment - taxes are paid only when their shares for sale and the proceeds on a boat or a car or a house to buy a lake.
Like most countries already NRST tax collection will be undertaken by States with a refund from the IRS, to the supporting documents or computer time or staff to pay, the need for "state.
If keeping our salaries, and instead we have a tax liability per month for our local, state and federal levelGovernment, as we had to do in public service, to the insurance company and the cable company's writing and the control I think the fair tax would be needed immediately.
Its intelligent thoughts and comments are welcome.
|
4 comments:
I support him without hesitation. But are too many people who lose when they distort regularly amended the proposal and the campaign against him. While I support, I know it will never happen in this country.
The words "fair" and "taxes" are not compatible. I do not remember the rule of the British class society, but you may not be the right word as a description for taxes. Perhaps it is an "associate inappropriate" for the correct word with the word "tax. For a tax to be fair, we must answer two simple tests. First, it should be ensured for all citizens and individuals in tax applicable group. kind of person one U.S. dollars kind of thing, regardless of income or social status. Second, they must be used for the benefit of all taxpayers, not without paying benefits. One could argue that the third condition that everyone agrees with the tax authorities is required, but the first two are sufficient to support that there is nothing fair about "ABOUT "taxes".
Those who are so-called "united Fair Tax" to the "right" to a tax system that they like to support more than the current system form. I love vanilla ice cream better than chocolate, I can as "fair" ice?
It may be true that you can suggest the system / support has many advantages, but everything is wrong "fair". Doing so encourages mistrust and suggest that fans want to do just about anything that benefits them.
Most people would not say it's a disaster event. While it may be better, could be much worse. His proposal could be much worse.
The 50 cents per dollar raised is missing. Where did you get this number? Federal taxes are approx. one billion U.S. dollars per year to 500 billion U.S. dollars cost, the collection of taxes. Nothing in the federal budget of 500 million euros.
Even if a national sales tax would be interesting (if you're not in poor and middle class), 15% to 20% as low. Especially with a Prebate. Just not entitled to recover the billions, or that you need. Try 30%, if not state taxes, contained maybe 40% to 50% when you try to replace state taxes with national sales tax. If people are reluctantinterest on that amount, it might work. If they are not willing to take on the economy.
If the economy is "underground," I see no compelling reason why people who produce something and sell services "off the record that all of a sudden feeling that the collection of VAT. In any case, the development of the economy, people can things much cheaper if you avoid the national VAT. Believe it or not, some people are greedy. If something costs $ 7.50 per retail chains, but $ 5.00 for a neighbor (not) the national fee, people who buy neighbors. Can you imagine how much it costs, would enforce a law?
Although it looks like I have advocated a form of consumption tax in the pAST. After all, if you have enough money to move income to have, in essence, you pay an excise tax. The get rich. They live a frugal life and accumulate positive assets that pay no taxes and are subject to taxation (income and VAT) to recognize the revenue side ".
This is (my opinion), the ruthless implementation of these programs is a recipe for disaster.
They think that everyone does not see a sudden failure and happy to pay what was right. There are two words that describe this concept is simple and the first bull. The fair tax, it would difficult to implement than the tax, and the burden on the poor. It was considered a bad idea since before most of us were born.
Post a Comment